Pengaruh Kompensasi Manajemen, Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Laba

Authors

  • Nur Anissa Universitas Satya Negara Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54964/liabilitas.v1i2.11

Keywords:

Kompensasi manajemen, kecurangan laporan keuangan, tata kelola perusahaan, kualitas laba

Abstract

Laba memainkan peran penting dalam laporan keuangan jika di dalamnya mengandung informasi tentang fenomena utama perusahaan tersampaikan kepada para pengguna dengan baik. Manfaat potensial informasi adalah hal penting dimana manfaat ditentukan oleh kualitas informasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan bukti empiris mengenai faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas laba, yaitu kompensasi manajemen, kecurangan laporan keuangan dan tata kelola perusahaan. Dalam penelitian ini, tata kelola perusahaan diproksi dengan efektifitas komite audit.

Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI pada periode 2010 sampai 2011 dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 110. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah regresi linear berganda.

Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kompensasi manajemen berpengaruh negatif terhadap kualitas laba dan efektifitas komite audit berpengaruh positif terhadap kualitas laba. Sedangkan, hipotesis kecurangan laporan keuangan berpengaruh negatif terhadap kualitas laba ditolak.

References

Anderson, S., & J. Cavanagh. 2003. Executive Excess 2003: CEO’s win, workers and taxpayers lose. Retrieved May 4, 2012, dari http://www.faireconomy.org/files/Executive_Excess_2003.pdf

Armstrong, Christopher S.; Jagolinzer, Alan D.; Larcker, David F. 2010. Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (2):225-271.

Bao, B dan Bao, D. 2004. Income Smoothing, Earnings Quality dan Firm Valuation. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 31 (9) & (10). November/December.

Beasley, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4): 443-465.

Beasley, M., J. Carcello, D. Hermanson dan T. Neal. 2010. Fraudulent Financial Reporting, 1987-1997: An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies. New York, NY: Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission.

Bebchuck, Lucian A. & Jesse M. Fried. 2004. Pay without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Harvard University Press.

Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. 2006. Pay without Performance: Overview of the Issues. Academy o f Management Perspectives, 20 (1): 5-24.

Berle, A. dan Means, G. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Macmillan, New York, NY.

Boyle, D. M., Brian W. Carpenter dan Dana R. Hermanson. 2012. CEOs, CFOs and Accounting Fraud: Implications of Recent Research. The CPA Journal (January): 62-65.

Brick, I .E., O. Palmon, & J. K. Wald. 2006. CEO Compensation, Director Compensation, and Firm Performance: Evidence of Cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.

Brown, L D., dan Sivakumar, K, 2001. Comparing the quality of Three Earning Measures. Working Paper. Georgia State University. Atlanta, GA 30303.

Coles, J. L., N.D. Daniel, and L Naveen. 2006. Managerial incentives and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics 79: 431-468.

Collins, D. dan W. Salatka. 1993. Noisy Accounting Earning Signals and Earning Response Coefficients: The Case of Foreign Currency Accounting. Contemporary Accounting Research 10 (1).

Collins, Daniel, Edward Maydew, and Ira Weiss. 1997. Changes in the valuerelevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics:39-67.

Cornell, B. dan W.R. Landsman. 2003. Accounting Valuation: Is earning Quality an Issue?. Financial Analysis Journal. November/December.

Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan & A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of earningsManipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1-36.

Deegan, C. 2004. Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Sydney.

Dorminey, W. J., Arron Scott Fleming, Marry-Jo Kranacher & Richard A. Riley, Jr. 2012. Financial Fraud. The CPA Journal (June): 61-65.

Ecker, F.,Francis, J., Kim, I., Olsson, P. & Schipper, K. 2006. A Return-Based Representation of Earnings Quality. The Accounting Review, 81: 749-780.

Efendi, J., A. Srivastava dan E. Swanson. 2007. Why Do Corporate Managers Misstate Financial Statements? The Role of Option Compensation and Other Factors. Journal of Financial Economics 85 (3): 667–708.

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 51-1 A.

Elliot, Robert K. & John Wilingham. 1980. Management Fraud: Deterrents and Detection. Petrocelli Books.

Erickson, M., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2006. Is There a Link Between Executive Equity Incentives and Accounting Fraud?. Journal of Accounting Research 44 (1): 113–143.

Fama, E. 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.

Fama, Eugene F., and Michael C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (June): 301-325.

Farrar, J. H. 2001. Corporate Governance in Australia and New Zealand. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Francis, J & Schipper, K. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance. Journal of Accounting Research 37(2):319 – 352.

Hogan, C. E., Z. Rezaee, R. A. Riley dan U. K. Velury. 2008. Financial Statement Fraud: Insights from the Academic Literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27 (2): 231–252.

Hoi, Chun-Keung & Ashok Robin. 2004. The Design of Incentive Compensation for Directors. Corporate Governance, 4 (3): 47-53.

Jensen, M. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.

Jensen, M. dan W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-60.

Johson, S. A., H. E. Ryan, Jr & Yisong S. Tian. 2005. Executive Compensation and Corporate Fraud. Working Paper.

Kalbers, Lawrence P. 2009. Fraudulent financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics: 1987-2007. Review of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 8 Iss: 2, pp.187 – 209.

Kinney, W. dan Linda McDaniel. 1989. Characteristics of Firms Correction Previously Reported Quarterly Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 45-60.

Murphy, Kevin J. 2002. Explaining executive compensation: Managerial power versus the perceived cost of stock options. The University of Chicago Law Review 69 (3), Summer: 847-869.

Nagar, Venky. 2002. Delegation and incentive compensation. The Accounting Review 77 (2): 379-395.

Nguyen, Khanh. (2008). Financial Statement Fraud: Motives, Methods, Cases and Detection. USA : Boca Raton, Florida.

Penman, S. H; dan Zhang, X. 2002. Accounting Conservatism, The Quality Of Earnings, And Stock Returns. The Accounting Review, April 77 (2).

Srinivasan, S. 2005. Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors: Evidence from Accounting Restatements and Audit Committee Members. Journal o f Accounting Research, 43(2): 291-334.

Trompeter, G. M.; Carpenter, Tina D.; Desai, Naman; Jones, Keith L.; Riley Jr., Richard A. 2013. A Synthesis of Fraud-Related Research. Auditing. Supplement 1, Vol. 32, p287-321. 35p. 1 Diagram. DOI: 10.2308/ajpt-50360.

Wild, J. J. 1996. The Audit Committee and Earnings Quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance (Spring): 247-276.

Winter, N. 2003. Fair Pay for Fair Play. CA Magazine, 136 (10), 34.

Wu, Min, 2002, Earnings restatements: A capital market perspective, PhD dissertation, New York University

Downloads

Published

2016-09-01

How to Cite

Nur Anissa. (2016). Pengaruh Kompensasi Manajemen, Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dan Tata Kelola Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Laba. Jurnal Liabilitas, 1(2), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.54964/liabilitas.v1i2.11