PENGARUH MODERASI VISI STRATEGIK TERHADAP HUBUNGAN KETERLIBATAN STRATEGIK DENGAN PERSEPSI KETIDAKPASTIAN LINGKUNGAN, PERSEPSI KEKUATAN KOMPETITIF, KETERLIBATAN KERJA, DAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASIONAL (SUATU RENCANA STUDI PADA SMU DAN SMK SEKECAMATAN CILEUNGSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54964/manajemen.v6i2.199Keywords:
Strategic Vision, Strategic Involvement, Perception of Environment Uncertainty, Perception of Competitive Strength, Job Involvement, Organizational CommitmentAbstract
The study in this article aims to produce a model of research moderating impact of strategic vision to the relationship of strategic involvement with perception of environment uncertainty, perception of competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. This article is a review of the literature, so that method being used is a literature review. This study is conducted by studying theories that have been established. The study also sourced and based on the results of previous research, especially empirical research results related to the variables that were studied in this article. In addition, if it is continued in empirical research, the study population are Head Master and Vice Head Master of SMU and SMK in Kecamatan Cileungsi Kabupaten Bogor. This article study produces a research model that explains the moderating impact of strategic vision to the relationship of strategic involvement with perception of environment uncertainty, perception of competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Hypotheses include the following; moderating impact of strategic vision to relationship strategic involvement is positively related and significant to perception of environment uncertainty, perception of competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Strategic vision moderate the relationship of strategic involvement with perception of environment uncertainty, Strategic vision moderates the relationship of strategic involvement with perception of competitive strength, job involvement, and organizational commitment.
References
Bourgoeouis, lll, L.J. 1985. Strategic goal, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environment. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (3): 548-573.
(Conger, J.A. 1989. The Charismatic Leader: Beyond The Mystique of Exceptional Leadership, San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dubin, R. 1956. Industrial worker’s world: a study of central life interests of industrial workers, Social Problem, dalam Blau,G.J. 1985. A multiple study investigation of the dimensionality of job involvement. Journal of Vicational Behavior, 9: 19-36.
Gordon.L.A & Narayanan, V.K. 1984. Management accounting systems, perceived environment uncertainty, and organizational structure: an empirical investigation. Accounting Organization & Social, 9 (1): 33-47.
Hair, J.F. Jr., R.E. Anderson, R.L.Atham, & W.C. Black 1998. Multivariate data Analysis, New Jersey: Prentice hall,Inc.
Huselid,M.A & Day,N.E. 1991. Organizational commitment, job involvement, and turnover: a substantive and methodological analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 380-391.
Ireland,R.D., Hitt, M.A., & de Porras, D.A. 1987. Strategy formulation process differences in perception of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level. Strategic Management Journal, 8: 459-485.
Kanungo,R.N. 1982. Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67: 341-349.
Kelly,D. 2000. Using vision to improve organizational communication. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 21 (2): 92-101.
Larwood,L., Falbe, C.M., Kringer, M.P, & Miesing, P. 1995. Structure and meaning of organizational vision. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3): 740-769.
Nanus,B. 1992. Visionary Leadership: Creating A Compelling Sense of Direction For Your Organization. san Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
Oswald,S.L., Mossholder, K.W. & Harris, S.G. 1994. Vision salience and strategic involvement: implication for psychological attachment to organizational and job. Strategic management Journal, 15: 477-489.
Oswald,S.L., Mossholder, K.W. & Harris, S.G. 1997. Relations between strategic involvement and manager’s perception’s of environment and competitive strengths. Group & Organization management, 22 (3): 343-365.
Parnell, J.A., Lester, D.L., & Menefee M.L. 2000. Strategy as response to organizational uncertainty: an alternative perspective on the strategy-performance relationship. Management Decision, 38 (8): 520-530.
Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques For Analyzing Industries and Competitor, New York: Free Press.
Sekaran,U. 2003. Research Methods For Business, 4 ed, New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Strickland,A.J. & Thompson,A.A. 2003. Strategic Management: Concept and Cases, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.Inc.
Sutcliffe, A.M. 1994. What executive notice: accurate perception in top management team. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5): 1360-1378.
Wang, P. & Chan, P.S. 1995. Top management perception of strategic processing in a turbulent environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 16 (7): 33-43.
Wooldridge, B. & Floyd, S.W. 1990. The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 231-241.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
